Filed under: rant

Facebook CEO Zuckerberg acknowledges privacy mistakes - May. 24, 2010

Facebook CEO: 'We've made mistakes' on privacy

by Laurie Segall, CNNMay 24, 2010: 9:40 AM ET


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, ending his silence about recent privacy controversies, has admitted to making some mistakes and promised to fix the problems.

read the rest here money.cnn.com

I've been thinking about this a lot lately. The truth is, generally speaking, facebook, even with mistakes, is more secure than the internet as a whole. You can find out anything about me online if you dig. (and for me personally, you don't have to dig deep). This is a reality we have come to accept. Any of us who have blogs, comment on blogs, have a website or even use email seems to understand this reality and consider it an acceptable risk.

The internet is to us, as a public building or street is in the brick and mortar world. I accept certain risks to my privacy and person when I leave my house. When I'm at the market, someone could recognize me and stop and want to chat even if I don't like them and I'll have to try to wriggle out of it somehow. I could be assaulted, I could have an accident, etc. These are all acceptable risks to me since I'm not agoraphobic.

My house is something altogether different. I consider it a space of secure privacy and safety. The risks to my safety and privacy decrease (generally speaking, all things being equal) when I'm in my house (or that's how I feel, I have no idea if that's statistically true but I would imagine it is taking all outside risks into account) as long as I take appropriate household safety precautions. The only people who enter my home are those I invite in. The only people who see me at my most vulnerable are those who are allowed. There is a risk of forced entry but it's low.*

The internet is to the world outside my home as facebook is to the space inside my home. I think much of the anger directed toward facebook/Zuckerberg lately is a result of people feeling incredibly violated. It's like we gave our house keys to a friend and that friend admitted a burglar while we were away. Should we have trusted Zuckerberg & co. as we would a friend? Perhaps not. But most of us aren't conspiracy theorists or paranoid people. Most of us trust that something will work as it claims and that people will honor their commitments and responsibilities.

So I guess the question is this - will facebook continue to be the inside/secure space of our internet lives as our homes are in our brick and mortar lives or do we need to just lump facebook into the rest of the internet and abandon those perceptions?

*caveat - some people use facebook primarily or even exclusively for business networking and promotion - this changes the facebook dynamic and for them, I think it becomes much more like a public space...or maybe a good comparison would be a networking coffee event - slightly more "secure" than the public market but less so than a home.

old people these days...

Angry_old_lady


I have had some interesting encounters with the elderly lately. Not long ago, some old man literally sarcastically scolded me and a table full of my friends for being too loud in the bar area of a restaurant.

Today, as I was loading my groceries into my car, some old lady got grumpy with me in the parking lot and actually told me to take my shopping cart back into the store
 
I just kind of cocked my head and said "no" and walked away. She looked at me like she was shocked I had the gall to tell her no, as if she'd never been told no before.

She said "well I'll just have to do it then". I said "ok, that's fine, but they pay people to collect the carts, no one is making you do it, so don't get snippy at me if you want to be the cart collector". She stomped off in a huff pushing the cart back to the store.
 
She was like 4'11" and probably less than 100 pounds and very likely close to 80 which actually makes the whole thing more comical in my mind. I felt like saying "look you little bitch, unless you're my grandma you can't just tell me what to do" *shaking head* Old people these days.

She seemed to be on a car collecting mission or something. My guess is she just got some new old granny car and was paranoid about the carts but mine was securely smashed into the pole like a dozen other carts in the lot.
 
The ridiculous thing is, if she hadn't gotten all up in my space and been little granny bitchy pants about it I might have obliged her. But after that little display of old person disrespect...I think not. *harumph

look who Relevant validated this month!

*disclaimer: Relevant is a decent magazine as far as Christian magazines go. I know a couple of the folks there and they're pretty rad. This in no way speaks against Relevant on the whole.

Relevant Magazine seems to have this schtick lately (probably always). They feature 1 or 2 celebrities every issue who are *cue excited giggle* CHRISTIANS! The tone always seems to be a sort of new validation of the person, as in: "oh look kids, you can watch Chuck now because Zachary Levi is a CHRISTIAN!" (it must be said here that Zachary Levi is darned near close to the most Biblical male name I've ever heard). I find this attitude a tad annoying if not disturbing...not least of which because the journalistic quality of these pieces tends to be piss-poor. "Tell us Zachary, how hard is it to be a Christian in Hollywood? (please ignore that we have asked EVERY SINGLE CHRISTIAN ACTOR this same lame question and give the most interesting response you possibly can preferably something that is cleverly humorous and/or somberly righteous)